If you read the letters in the Herald, you can't help but realize this Obama Presidential Center in the park is a very poor plan from the start. There is simply no reason to plow up our historic, Olmsted-designed park when vacant lots lie all over the neighborhood. 

It's a poor location for a mid-rise building, smack in the middle of the Park. If you looked at US Fish and Wildlife studies of migrating birds, you'd see that. It is also a poor idea to cut down 800 to 1,000 trees from the Park. Have you considered urban heat islands, global warming, habitat for wildlife? 
 
Why this group insists on the park, and only the park, this makes me nervous. Why can't this be built in the city? What magic ingredient does the Park bring to your plan? 
 
Do you really believe Obama will pack up, move? He's already said that isn't the case. 
 
There are many Chicagoans who remember the destruction of our historic buildings, such as the Stock Exchange, demolished in 1972. What we are witnessing here is a similar desecration of our cultural legacy, in this case historic landscape design. Tearing down historic buildings is one thing. This — this is just a crime. 
 
In order to build the OPC in the park, all manner of road revisions are required. This will pave even more of the park (28 acres), and cost taxpayers $200 million. 
 
Cornell Drive will be removed, but now Hayes Drive becomes a highway. I don't see that as an improvement. Traffic will be worse with these road revisions.
 
I'd point out that over the years, we've created new habitat areas, we've strived to make our Parks wildlife friendly. Environmental impact does not seem to have been considered in these plans. Did they consult with biologists or ornithologists on these plans? There is no evidence of that. 
 
This is a twenty-three-story tall building, it lacks windows, and birds will go crashing into it. This belongs in the city, not in the park. This isn't a Presidential library, but a community center. Let's be honest — the OPC robs local residents, local children, of their park. There is no make-up land provided. The Midway is already a park. To say that it is now magically make-up land does not make it so.
 
This does not protect or preserve our Park. The Obama Center will function as a museum, and they will charge admission.
 
Why not move it across the street? Plaisance Hotel site? Or along M.L. King Drive? This would enlarge these parks. The park would be their front yard. 
 
Ross Petersen

(2) comments

Ross Petersen

I think most Chicagoans agree- this is a Terrible location for this building. Between the OPC, road widening projects, this will completely change Jackson Park. A mid-rise building will now tower over the Park, dark and looming. It is also an unattractive, windowless, stone covered eyesore that doesn't measure up to Chicago design. What most people don't realize is this is a back door effort to gentrify Woodlawn. The better location is on King Drive and Garfield. Opposition to this only grows. Thank you for your support.

Lena

I agree with Ross Petersen. Rents and cost of living have soared within the past five years due to gentrification. In addition to destroying the environment, our parks, and our lakefront, OPC will make rents and taxes go through the roof! Where are all of the environmentalists and bleeding heart liberals when you need them? Keep Hyde Park green. Vote 'NO' for OPC.

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.