To the Editor:

The map that dilutes the Black vote was passed in the House and Senate last week, and awaits the Governor's signature. During last week's House Redistricting Committee hearing, we learned from Redistricting Chairwoman Elizabeth Hernandez that the Legislature restored at least 4 historically Black districts that lost population to their historical majority-Black status. They refused to do that for Representative District 9, Representative District 10 and Senate District 5. These districts include Black communities like North Lawndale, East Garfield Park and West Garfield Park.

We have been asking the Redistricting Committee to restore these districts to their historic majority-Black status since we started participating in the redistricting hearings in March. We shared data that showed demographic shifts in the districts over the last 10 years. We also shared maps and data indicating that, in spite of population shifts, these districts could be restored to their historically majority Black status using a deviation of 4%. That is, creating a district that is 4% smaller than the remaining districts. This smaller district would have the same power and privileges as every other district in the state. This practice is permissible under the Voting Rights Act of 1964, to ensure that minorities can elect a candidate of choice.

The state legislature hired a consultant to testify at the May 25 hearing. He seemed to suggest that we don't need majority-Black districts for Blacks to elect candidates of choice. He used Barack Obama as an example. As I have repeatedly explained to the legislature, I don't think we should take that chance. These districts include some of the state's poorest communities on the west end, with some of the state's wealthiest communities on the east end. They are undergoing rapid demographic change on the east end. Over time, Black candidates from the poorest communities would be extremely challenged competing with more well resourced candidates from the central and eastern sections of the district.

The Legislature went on to draw a map that had 15 majority Black districts. Ten years ago, the Legislature drew 16 majority Black districts. This is a reduction of one majority Black district from 10 years ago. This action is justified by some by the fact that "Blacks have lost population.". The truth of the matter is, the group that lost the greatest population in the state is white people, with a loss of over 500,000 people. In spite of the fact that we have lost population over the past 10 years, the Black percentage of the state's population has not changed. We were 14% of the state's population in 2011 and we are 14% of the state's population today. Why did we lose a majority-Black district?

From where I'm sitting, the state legislature has clearly put politics ahead of Black Voting Rights in the development of this map.

Valerie Leonard

(0) comments

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.