Dear Editor,

The Jackson Park Advisory Council's recent proposal to make it more difficult for community members with children, jobs, or other time commitments to participate in their organization's decision-making is outrageous, but unsurprising from an organization whose most visible recent achievement is the installation of locking metal "security gates" on the two bridges onto Wooded Island (originally intended to be locked each day at dusk — before 5 p.m., this time of year). This is a group that wants to exclude the community from both its meetings and from the park itself — because it fears the community. Why does JPAC fear the community? Because JPAC does not represent what the vast majority of Jackson Park's users want, and they know it.

And since this is clearly the case, why should community members bother with JPAC? Many of us prefer to pick up trash in the park alone, or with neighbors who aren't trying to prevent us from having a vote at park-related community meetings. And of course, the majority of us have jobs and other obligations that prevent us from having the leisure time to attend four 7 p.m. meetings and three "volunteer events" of unstated duration in order to qualify as voting members of JPAC.

If JPAC wants to be an exclusive, members-only club, let them be that. But if that's what they want to be, their desires should be given far less priority by the City's decisionmakers. A group as exclusive as JPAC is should not have the power to take away normal access to a park throughway from the majority of residents, who simply want to be able to take a walk after work and enjoy the sunset without fear of running into a locked gate. We do not all have time to attend hours of meetings and events, on top of our usual day-to-day work and family commitments, in order to protect the basic access to green space that is the core function of public parks.

I encourage all concerned park users to write to the Park District and the alderman to let them know that JPAC does not speak for the community, and that they must do more to base their decisions about the park on truly representative community input. Here's who to write to: Alderman Leslie Hairston ( and the Chicago Park District (Area Manager for Jackson Park:; South Region Director:; Interim CEO: Don't have the energy to write a letter? Send them a copy of (or a link to) this one.

I also encourage all readers to attend the next JPAC meeting on Monday, January 10 at 7 PM in the Jackson Park Fieldhouse to make your voice heard. (Good luck finding information about this public meeting on JPAC's website, though — it's not there).

Rebecca Hall

(4) comments


OK, but how the JPAC getting simple, needed things done like....

Cull most of the 10,000 Canadian Geese pooping over 1 lbs every day. This toxic poop destroys the water in the lagoon and even in Lake Michigan beaches.

One of the reasons there are so few youth sports groups using Jackson Park and Washington Park is that parents don't want their children playing in geese or human excrement/poop.

Lots of supposedly "Liberal" places like Denver and Seattle WA culled their Canadian Geese pests,

Why can't we?

Ross Petersen

I'd suggest you attend a JPAC meeting, bring the topic up. There are a number of maintenance issues before the council: both the Park's bathrooms remain closed - for years; also the Darrow Bridge. There are golf-course revisions that will remove another 2,000 trees, it will remove the SSCC's nature area, it will move Jackson Bark, the dog-friendly area. Some years ago the Park district had a contractor, "Wild Goose Chase", to deter geese. The Park district ended their contract without explanation. These geese are federally protected, cannot be harmed. To "cull most of the 10,000 geese" is a federal offense. How did Denver and Seattle manage this?



I'd like to attend a JPAC meeting and make a presentation showing how other cities and suburbs successfully handled their Canadian Geese infestations.

Can you e-mail when is the next/best JPAC meeting where I could present a proposal and what kind of educational materials (laptop?) I should bring:

Here's my e-mail Thanks Ross for all you do for our Jackson Park

Ross Petersen

This is Not how an advisory council should function. An advisory council should facilitate communication with the Park District, not impede it. It must be open to all, and there should Never be a requirement for dues, or participating in volunteer activities. This appears to be an effort to shut out citizens who do have a right to participate in this council.

There are a number of items / topics before the council, including the gates on Wooded Island, the dog Park known as Jackson Bark, two bathrooms closed for many years, as well as the Darrow Bridge, golf course plans, to name but a few. All are encouraged to attend.

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.