To the Editor:

Senator Daniel Patrick Moynihan is famously quoted: “Everyone is entitled to their own opinion but they are not entitled to their own facts.” So how to respond to Ms. Misurell-Mitchell’s “OPC’s seven sins”? (See p. 4 of Aug. 19 Herald.)  

We respond to her statements by citing factual sources. Check out these sources and decide for yourself.

Library: To escape 19th-century library technology, the Obama Foundation and National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) agreed in February 2019 that in lieu of an archival library, the Obama Foundation would underwrite the cost of digitizing all paper documents and turn over full control of Obama presidential archives to NARA. The Presidential Libraries Act of 1955 does not require a former president to build a record storage facility. Of course, all this has been done quite publicly.;

Site Ecology: The Obama Foundation hired a team with previous experience with Olmsted parks and deep knowledge of Jackson Park’s history, ecology and site conditions. Their extensive studies of the site’s trees and soil, water and drainage patterns, and biodiversity have led to numerous design changes above and below ground. These changes will transform the site from a mostly grassy space into varied natural environments that take advantage of site characteristics.;

Traffic: Cornell Drive, as designed by Frederick Olmsted, was never meant to be a six-lane expressway. Why do opponents of the OPC location continue this debate? Removing the expressway and restoring the park has generated a new traffic plan for the area that will improve traffic flows, pedestrian safety, and expanded transportation options to support both the OPC and the connectivity and growth of South Side neighborhoods.;

Economic Development: Ms. Misurell-Mitchell simply ignores the transformative opportunities that the OPC presents to Woodlawn and the South and West sides. Through the Lakeside Alliance contractors, an estimated 5,000 jobs are expected to be created, targeting minority firms and offering job training to South and West Side residents — for real jobs leading to union membership and future opportunities. New housing and business opportunities are emerging through developing City-Community initiatives. The Museum of Science and Industry pre-pandemic attracted close to a million visitors; is it far-fetched to think that a museum campus for MSI and OPC would attract 700,000 visitors?;

Financial Viability: The Obama Foundation’s 2020 audit and tax return have been reported in many places, including the Herald. The Foundation has thus far raised over $700 million to support OPC construction and programming. It is committed to meeting a cumulative fundraising goal of $1.6 billion over the next five years.;

Whatever one’s views on the merit of the Jackson Park site, debate is over and bulldozers are moving. It’s time to get on with the project and make it as beneficial to all of us as possible.

South Side Neighbors 4 Hope


Erin Adams

Mary Anton

Jay Franke

Louise McCurry

Judith McCue

(2) comments

Ross Petersen

I think You are twisting the facts, here. The Obama Presidential Library is currently housed in a warehouse (Hoffman Estates) and this is a 'temporary' arrangement. The OPC in Jackson Park is Not a Presidential Library but a center. It is unclear which papers will go online, and historians have been complaining. No study done by the Chicago Public Library ever identified Jackson Park or the surrounding area as being in need of a library. The foundation intends to charge the CPL rent for this branch. This was 'tacked on' so they could say -and library. It isn't. Ms. Mitchell's comments are true.

As to site ecology, or environmental impact, it appears that this 'firm' (with knowledge of Olmsted Parks) is oblivious to the area's importance as a major migratory flyway. Have they not seen US Fish and Wildlife Service doppler radar images of this area?

This 235 foot tall building will cause numerous collisions. I question the competency of this firm, and I continue to wonder - just how was it the City got away with this, without being required to do an Environmental Impact Statement?

And what happened to public Parks, belonging to all, now being bulldozed?

What happened to our legal reviews of this project? We got no review, just the rubber-stamp.

I think that's an environmental crime, and the lawsuits will continue.


Why do we pay taxes and vote? Because we have to have representation. That did not happen. That cannot be defended. I live here. I walk the Jackson Park Wooded Isle, Bird Sanctuary and Japanese Garden for the past 20+ years with photos and video of the four seasons.

What the original designeres planned was for people to enjoy the parks. The travel (most motorist going to work) provided via Cornell Drive is an essential thoroghfare... I don't know if the original designers considered trucks and cars, but it works forthe TAXPAYERS. This was motivated by getting land that was not available, but for the weight of the first African-American president. Emanuel and the city council took advantage of the public trust. They could have left Cornell Drive open and not HAD to cut down almost 1K trees and displaced residents that use the park for summer respite and relief. If I pay for something and it's taken away without my input, that's call.....? Which is why I believe lawsuits are in order to defend the public's interest that was ignored. Why pay taxes-it's the law?

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.