New Districts

Parts of the new (right to left) 5th, 26th and 25th state House districts on the mid-South Side. The 25th and 26th House districts will combine to form the 13th Senate District.

SPRINGFIELD — Democrats in the General Assembly pushed through a new set of legislative maps during a one-day special session on Aug. 31, although the process they used sparked the ire of Republicans and voting rights advocates alike.

If accepted by Gov. J.B. Pritzker, as they are expected to be, the new maps would replace those adopted in May, which were passed without the benefit of official 2020 U.S. Census data. But they will also have to pass muster with a federal court, where two lawsuits are pending, and possibly the Illinois Supreme Court.

The plan adopted the night of Aug. 31 was actually the third draft of a redistricting plan that had been introduced in the span of less than 48 hours. The first was formally released on the afternoon of Aug. 30 and was the subject of a contentious public hearing that night. A second, amended version was introduced the next morning, barely one hour before the start of a hearing in the House Redistricting Committee, and that plan was changed slightly again just before the House came into session to debate the package.

The current 25th Illinois House District contains all of North Kenwood, from 43rd to 47th streets and from Drexel Boulevard to the lakefront, and southern Kenwood from Woodlawn Avenue to the Lakefront. It also contained Hyde Park east of Ellis Avenue and northeastern Woodlawn, though its segment of that neighborhood is more jagged. The district's incumbent representative is Curtis J. Tarver II (D), who vice-chairs the House Redistricting Committee. The 25th then stretches all along the lakefront to the Indiana border.

The 26th House District contains the rest of Hyde Park-Kenwood and the rest of Woodlawn east of Cottage Grove Avenue and neighborhoods all the way north to Gold Coast and Streeterville (disconnected from the populated lakefront South Side neighborhoods by Grant Park and the Museum Campus) and south all the way to South Chicago. Rep. Kam Buckner (D) is the district’s legislator.

The 5th District, currently represented by Lamont J. Robinson, Jr. (D), contains the rest of Bronzeville with the 26th, as well as Washington Park and West Woodlawn. The 5th, 26th and 25th together cover South Shore.

Under the new maps, all of North Kenwood will remain in the 25th District, as will all of southern Kenwood except for six square blocks bounded by Hyde Park and Drexel boulevards, 49th Street and Woodlawn Avenue, which is included in the 26th District.

The state legislative geography of Hyde Park substantially changes, as practically all populated parts of the neighborhood have been drawn into the new 25th District.

The new 26th District covers only a few blocks with housing, such as the one bounded by 53rd and 54th streets and Maryland and Cottage Grove avenues and the few standout buildings near the University of Chicago Medical Center campus.

The new 26th covers the small southwestern corner of the neighborhood, dominated by the university's medical, athletic and academic facilities, including the Main Quadrangle, 1100 E. 58th St. It does not include student dormitories north of the Midway Plaisance, which have been mapped into the new 25th District.

Meanwhile in Woodlawn, the House districts have been shifted east. The 5th now extends, on a ragged border, from Ellis to Kenwood Avenue. Months ago, Politico Illinois suggested that state Sen. Mattie Hunter (3rd), the Democratic committeewoman for the Woodlawn-based 20th Ward, wanted her district, which includes the 5th House District, to include more of that neighborhood.

The new 13th Senate District will continue to comprise both the 25th and 26th House districts; Sen. Robert Peters (D) is that district’s incumbent legislator.

In Springfield the morning of Aug. 31, the Rev. Robin Hood of the Chicago-based United Congress of Community and Religious Organizations, or UCCRO, said he was speaking for thousands of people over the last several months who have said they needed at least 30 days to review the new map.

“It would be unfair to us if we didn’t have the time to get the map out to all our people and make a decision based on expedience,” he said.

Hood and other advocates testified virtually during a hearing that was originally scheduled for 10 a.m., but which had to be postponed because the bill containing the new proposal, House Amendment 2 to Senate Bill 927, wasn’t released until just minutes before that time.

The committee also heard from representatives of the Chicago Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights and the Decalogue Society of Lawyers, a group that advocates for Jewish communities in Illinois, both of which urged lawmakers to allow more time for the public to review the latest proposal.

The bulk of the 1,269-page bill is made up of lists of census block numbers, townships, wards and precincts that define each proposed House and Senate district. It was accompanied by a separate resolution explaining how the districts were drawn.

The Aug. 31 hearing followed one held the previous evening, during which several advocacy groups complained about getting short notice of the meeting and little time to review the proposal.

Common Cause Illinois, a political reform advocacy group, issued a statement on the afternoon of Aug. 30 saying it would boycott the hearing out of protest for the way in which lawmakers were conducting the redistricting process.

“Since the beginning, we’ve pleaded with lawmakers to keep the redistricting process open, transparent, and accessible to no avail,” the group’s executive director, Jay Young, said in a statement. “This latest, last-minute hearing provides almost no notice to the public. The new maps will be released less than a day before lawmakers vote on them. It’s shameful, and our organization refuses to add any legitimacy to such an undemocratic process.”

But Cicero state Rep. Lisa Hernandez (D-24th) who chaired the House committee, defended the process during debate on the House floor.

“The House and Senate Democrats worked tirelessly to bring stakeholders and communities from across the state together for their input,” she said. “Fifty hearings in the spring, nine hearings this August, multiple ways to testify and submit recommendations, a public mapping portal to submit maps. Did everyone get everything they wanted? No. But everyone was heard. Redistricting is a complex exercise with many competing interests and priorities.”

Republicans, however, complained that the web portal Democrats had set up to allow people to submit their own proposals actually didn’t work and many individuals were unable to use it. They also complained that the final maps brought to the floor did not reflect the concerns that many communities had raised, but instead were drawn to protect the political interests of the Democratic majorities.

Ultimately, though, the new redistricting plan passed both chambers strictly along party lines – 73-43 in the House; 40-17 in the Senate. Peters, Tarver and Buckner voted in favor.

Afterwards, the reform advocacy group CHANGE Illinois, which has long advocated for an independent redistricting commission to redraw maps every 10 years, issued a statement condemning the process.

“Drawing district maps in locked back rooms yet again, Illinois lawmakers underscored their utter disregard for the will of the people and for the bedrock democratic principles of open government by and for the people,” the group’s executive director, Madeleine Doubek, said in a statement. “Gov. Pritzker said he wanted maps that reflect the state’s rich diversity. These maps fall far short of that request and should be rejected by him. Failing that, we hope the courts will force the correction of lawmakers’ callous political mapping calculations.”

Democratic leaders had called the special session shortly after the Aug. 12 release of official, detailed data from the 2020 U.S. Census that showed the maps they approved in May, and which Pritzker signed into law, were significantly out of balance and would likely be held unconstitutional.

Two federal lawsuits were filed challenging those maps – one by legislative Republican leaders, and another by the Mexican American Legal Defense and Educational Fund, or MALDEF. Those cases are before a three-judge panel in federal court in Chicago, which has scheduled a status hearing for Wednesday, Sept. 1, to be briefed on whatever changes are made during the special session.

Lawmakers crafted the earlier maps using population estimates from the Census Bureau’s American Community Survey, arguing that it was the “best data available at the time.” It also enabled Democrats to argue that they met the June 30 deadline in the Illinois Constitution for the legislature to approve new maps, thus avoiding sending the work to a bipartisan commission where Republicans would have a 50-50 chance of controlling the process.

Republicans, however, argue that the maps approved in May were unconstitutional and, therefore, not “effective” by June 30, and they are seeking to force the appointment of a bipartisan commission.

Gettinger reported from Chicago. Capitol News Illinois is a nonprofit, nonpartisan news service covering state government funded primarily by the Illinois Press Foundation and the Robert R. McCormick Foundation.

(0) comments

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.